3%
F-
Challenge Status Quo and Support Great Solutions
119th Congress (2025-2026) Support Great Solutions
F- (0%)
118th Congress (2023-2024) Support Great Solutions
F- (0%)
117th Congress (2021-2022) Challenge Status Quo
F- (0%)
116th Congress (2019-2020) Challenge Status Quo
F- (0%)
115th Congress (2017-2018) Challenge Status Quo
F- (0%)
114th Congress (2015-2016) Challenge Status Quo
D- (20%)
113th Congress (2013-2014) Challenge Status Quo
F- (0%)
112th Congress (2011-2012) Challenge Status Quo
F- (5%)
0%
F-
Reduce Chain Migration
119th Congress (2025-2026) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
117th Congress (2021-2022) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
116th Congress (2019-2020) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
115th Congress (2017-2018) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
114th Congress (2015-2016) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
113th Congress (2013-2014) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
111th Congress (2009-2010) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
110th Congress (2007-2008) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
109th Congress (2005-2006) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
108th Congress (2003-2004) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
107th Congress (2001-2002) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Reduce Chain Migration
F- (0%)
1996: Voted for the Chrysler-Berman Amendment that would continue the practice of chain migration.
Senator Markey voted for the Chrysler-Berman Amendment to H.R.2202 (Smith). Had the amendment failed, H.R.2202 would have eliminated or significantly reduced several extended-family immigration categories. It would have reduced overall legal immigration by almost 2.5 million over a ten-year period. Instead, the amendment, sponsored by congressmen Chrysler, Berman and Brownback, passed by 238-183.
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Reduce Chain Migration
no action
0%
F-
Reduce Visa Lottery
119th Congress (2025-2026) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
117th Congress (2021-2022) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
116th Congress (2019-2020) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
115th Congress (2017-2018) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
114th Congress (2015-2016) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
113th Congress (2013-2014) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
111th Congress (2009-2010) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
110th Congress (2007-2008) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
109th Congress (2005-2006) Reduce Visa Lottery
F- (0%)
2005-2006: Voted against a bill to eliminate visa lottery.
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 4437 which included a provision to eliminate the visa lottery that each year awards 55,000 visas on a random basis. H.R. 4437 was passed by the House by a vote of 239 to 182.
2005-2006: Voted against an amendment to eliminate visa lottery.
Rep. Markey voted on the floor of the House against the Goodlatte amendment to H.R. 4437. The Goodlatte Amendment would eliminate the visa lottery program that each year awards 55,000 visas on a random basis. The Amendment passed by a vote of 273 to 148.
108th Congress (2003-2004) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
107th Congress (2001-2002) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Reduce Visa Lottery
F- (0%)
1996: Voted for an amendment that increased the number of visas in the visa lottery.
Rep. Markey voted for the Chrysler-Berman Amendment to H.R.2202 (Smith). This was a vote against a 50 percent reduction in the number of visas allocated to the lottery category. H.R.2202 would have reduced overall legal immigration by approximately 27,000 a year by cutting the lottery in half, which would have been a reduction of 270,000 over 10 years. Ultimately, the Chrysler-Berman Amendment, sponsored by congressmen Chrysler, Berman and Brownback, passed by a vote of 238-183, stripping legal reforms from the bill.
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Reduce Visa Lottery
no action
38%
C-
Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
119th Congress (2025-2026) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
117th Congress (2021-2022) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
F- (0%)
2022: Voted in favor of H.R. 2471 to increase in H-2B and EB-5 visas Sen. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 2471, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, introduced by Rep. Hakeem Jefferies (D-N.Y.). The legislation authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to double the number of H-2B low-skill, non-agricultural visas for FY2022. Further, the legislation reauthorizes the EB-5 investor visa program. The legislation was signed into law.
116th Congress (2019-2020) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
F- (0%)
2020: Voted in favor of H.R 133, the Consolidated Appropriations Act on Senate floor Sen. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 133, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, that would weaken interior enforcement and increase foreign worker visas. The bill reduced funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement by $431 million. Further, the bill authorized the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor to increase the number of H-2B visas issued during the 2021 fiscal year.
2020: Cosponsored S. 3599, the Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act, to increase green cards for doctors and nurses Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 3599, the Healthcare Workforce Resilience Act, introduced by Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.). The legislation would recapture 40,000 green cards that would otherwise go unused as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic and allow for those green cards to be issued to foreign doctors and nurses with applications submitted within 90 days of the end of the Covid-19 national emergency.
2019: Voted in favor of H.R. 1865, the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, to increase H-2B visas Sen. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 1865, the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, that provides funding for the federal government for FY2020. H.R. 1865 included a provision that authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to nearly double the available H-2B visas for the remainder of FY 2020. Under the same provision, DHS added an additional 30,000 H-2Bs in FY 2019.
115th Congress (2017-2018) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
F (6%)
2017: Voted in favor of increasing foreign worker visas Sen. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 244, the 2017 omnibus spending bill. A provision of the bill allows DHS to raise the H-2B cap by 70,000 in 2017 by excluding returning H-2B workers. The spending bill, and the H-2B provision, covers half of 2017.
114th Congress (2015-2016) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
A+ (100%)
2015: Voted against the FY2016 Omnibus Spending bill to increase foreign guest workers Sen. Markey voted against H.R. 2029, the Omnibus Spending bill for 2016. This legislation would increase the number of H-2B low-skilled, non-agricultural guest worker visas issued in 2016 from 66,000 to 264,000. The legislation would exempt foreign workers who had received an H-2B visa in any of the past three years from the 2016 cap.
2015: Voted against H.R. 2146 to grant President authority to expand immigration levels without Congress consent via Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) Sen. Markey voted against final passage of Trade Promotion Authority bill, H.R. 2146. (NOTE: in order to pass TPA the House of Representatives split the original bill Senate-passed bill H.R. 1314 into two bills, one dealing with Trade Adjustment Assistance and one dealing with the TransPacific Partnership. As a result, when the legislation came back to the Senate for a final vote, the Senate had to attach the TPA language to another House-originated bill, H.R. 2146 and vote to pass that legislation). This legislation would set up fast-track procedures for the passage of trade deals negotiated by the president. Although Ambassador Froman, the U.S. Trade Representative, repeatedly assured Members of Congress that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will not include immigration provisions that require the United States to change its laws, the Living Agreement provision of TPP means by its very terms that President Obama, or his successor, can change the provisions of the agreement however he chooses with no input whatsoever from Congress and regardless of what TPA instructs. H.R. 2146 passed the Senate by a vote of 60-38.
2015: Voted against granting President authority to expand immigration levels without Congress consent via Trade Promotion Authority in 2015 Sen. Markey voted against final passage of Trade Promotion Authority bill, H.R. 1314. This legislation would set up fast-track procedures for the passage of trade deals negotiated by the president. Although Ambassador Froman, the U.S. Trade Representative, repeatedly assured Members of Congress that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will not include immigration provisions that require the United States to change its laws, the Living Agreement provision of TPP means by its very terms that President Obama, or his successor, can change the provisions of the agreement however he chooses with no input whatsoever from Congress and regardless of what TPA instructs. H.R. 1314 passed the Senate by a vote of 62-37.
113th Congress (2013-2014) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
F- (0%)
2012: Supported a motion to increase foreign worker visas Rep. Markey voted in favor of the motion to recommit H.R. 6429, the STEM Jobs Act of 2012 (Rep. Lamar Smith). The bill also eliminates the visa lottery program that grants 55,00 visas annually on a random basis. This motion was an attempt by House Democrats to remove the visa lottery elimination from the bill. This motion, if passed, would have replaced the STEM Jobs Act with Rep. Zoe Lofgrens H.R. 6412, legislation that adds more than 50,000 employment based visas and NOT ended the visa lottery. The motion failed 157-231 (30 Nov. 2012, 11:31 AM).
111th Congress (2009-2010) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
110th Congress (2007-2008) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
109th Congress (2005-2006) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
A- (88%)
2005-2006: Voted against CAFTA, foreign worker importation program (Delay)
Rep. Markey voted against H.R. 3045, the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (CAFTA), on July 28, 2005 (12:03 AM). It is expected that CAFTA would create the expectation of immigration and lead to an increase in illegal immigration. H.R. 3045 was sponsored by Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas).
2005-2006: Voted against an amendment to prohibit foreign-worker importation provisions in Free Trade Agreements.
Rep. Markey voted against the Tancredo Amendment to H.R. 2862 to prevent the U.S. Trade Representative from including immigration provisions in Free Trade Agreements. The Tancredo Amendment failed by a vote of 106 to 322.
108th Congress (2003-2004) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
A+ (100%)
2003-2004: Voted against a bill to increase foreign-worker visas (DeLay).
Rep. Markey voted against the Chile Free Trade Agreement, H.R. 2738, that would permit an unlimited number of tech and professional workers from Chile to enter the U.S. on L-1 visas. H.R. 2738, sponsored by Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), passed by a vote of 270-156.
2003-2004: Voted against a bill to create worker importation program (DeLay).
Rep. Markey voted against the Singapore Free Trade Agreement, H.R. 2739 that would permit an unlimited number of tech and professional workers to enter the U.S. on L-1 visas. H.R. 2739, sponsored by Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), passed by a vote of 272-155.
107th Congress (2001-2002) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
D- (18%)
1996: Voted for an amendment that would have increased the importation of foreign workers.
Senator Markey voted for the Chrysler-Berman Amendment to H.R.2202 (Smith). It was a vote in favor of a continuous stream of unskilled workers--those who compete with Americans and other immigrants for low-wage jobs and further depress the wages for those jobs. Had the amendment failed, H.R.2202 would have reduced overall legal immigration by almost 2.5 million over a ten-year period. Instead, the amendment, sponsored by congressmen Chrysler, Berman and Brownback, passed by 238-183.
1996: Voted against the Burr Amendment which would continue a foreign nurse guestwork program
The Burr amendment to H.R.2202 would have continued a foreign nurses guestworker program. The amendment, sponsored by Richard Burr, was defeated 154-262.
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Reduce Unnecessary Worker Visas
no action
11%
F
Refugees & Asylees
119th Congress (2025-2026) Refugees & Asylees
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Refugees & Asylees
F- (0%)
2023: Voted against S. Amdt. 110 to H.R. 3476 to reduce Asylum Fraud
Sen. Markey voted against S. Amdt. 110, offered by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) to H.R. 3476. S. Amdt. 110 would have added the House-passed H.R. 2 to the Debt Limit compromise bill. The legislation would significantly reduce asylum fraud by strengthening the credible fear standard to ensure that only those who are more than likely to be awarded asylum by an immigration judge are allowed to continue with the asylum process. Further, it would prohibit individuals who cross the border illegally from claiming asylum and prevent asylum seekers from receiving a work permit for one year after entry.
2023: Sponsored S. 883 to expand refugee resettlement
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 883, the New Deal for New Americans Act, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). The legislation would expand refugee resettlement to at least 110,000 per year.
117th Congress (2021-2022) Refugees & Asylees
F- (0%)
2021: Sponsored S. 295 to expand protected status for Hong Kongers Sen. Markey sponsored S. 295, the Hong Kong Safe Harbor Act, introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). The legislation would provide refugee status to Hong Kongers involved in peaceful political protests.
2021: Sponsored S. 1996 to expand refugee and asylum numbers Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1996, the GLOBE Act, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). The legislation would qualify sexual orientation or gender identity under the social groups provision of refugee/asylum law. This change would immediately qualify an estimated 640 million foreign citizens for refugee or asylum status in the U.S.
116th Congress (2019-2020) Refugees & Asylees
F- (0%)
2019: Cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR). The bill would severely limit the separation of families, lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement limiting the amount of time minors can be detained, remove the federal prohibition on taxpayer-funded council for illegal aliens, and increases the number of immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1733, the Protecting Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, to encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1733, the Protecting Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). The bill would: 1) prevent the separation of families within 100 miles of the border, 2) call for limited detention of family units, 3) lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement that requires the feds to release minors within 20 days, 4) appoint taxpayer-funded attorneys for UACs in removal proceedings, and add 75 immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1894, the Alternatives to Detention Act of 2019, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1894, the Alternatives to Detention Act of 2019, introduced by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV). The bill would expand Alternatives to Detention (ATD) to aliens who are members of a vulnerable population and defines vulnerable population as nearly every one.
2019: Cosponsored S. 292, the Keep Families Together Act, introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 292, the Keep Families Together Act of 2019. This legislation would effectively bar the removal of a child from a parent within 100 miles of the border, creating a large incentive for more illegal aliens to attempt to come to the United States and take advantage of children to do so.
2019: Cosponsored S. 557, the REUNITE Act, introduces by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 557, the REUNITE Act of 2019. This legislation would require the reunification of separated families, require expanded ATD, create local offices of reunification, and allocate $50,000,000 for these purposes. The legislation would encourage more family units to cross the U.S. border illegally.
2019: Cosponsored S. 661, the Child Trafficking Victims Protection and Welfare Act of 2019, introduced by Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 661, the Child Trafficking Victims Protection and Welfare Act of 2019. This legislation would implement confidentiality provisions, prohibit family separations, and put in place new standards of care and access to legal counsel for illegal alien minors. The legislation would encourage unaccompanied alien children and family units to cross the border illegally.
2019: Cosponsored S. 388, the Families, Not Facilities Act, introduced by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 388, the Families, Not Facilities Act of 2019. It would transfer $220 million to the Department of Justice, Office of Refugee Resettlement, and Administration for Children and Families. In doing so, the legislation would encourage additional UACs and family units to cross the border illegally.
115th Congress (2017-2018) Refugees & Asylees
F- (0%)
2017: Cosponsored legislation nullifying Pres. Trumps Refugee Resettlement executive order (Murphy) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 549. This legislation would nullify Pres. Trumps Jan. 27, 2017 executive order that reduced the refugee cap from 85,000 to 50,000 for FY17. The bills main sponsor is Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT).
2017: Cosponsored legislation to nullify President Trumps refugee executive order (Murphy) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 248. This legislation would nullify Executive Order 13769, thereby increasing the refugee cap by 35,000. The legislations main sponsor is Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT).
2017: Cosponsored legislation nullifying Pres. Trumps Refugee Resettlement executive order (Feinstein) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 608. This legislation would nullify Pres. Trumps Jan. 27, 2017 executive order that reduced the refugee cap from 85,000 to 50,000 for FY17. The bills main sponsor is Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA).
2017: Cosponsored legislation to nullify President Trumps refugee executive order (Feinstein) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 274. This legislation would nullify Executive Order 13769, thereby increasing the refugee cap by 35,000. The legislations main sponsor is Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.).
2017: Cosponsored legislation to nullify President Trumps refugee executive order (Feinstein) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 240. This legislation would nullify Executive Order 13769, thereby increasing the refugee cap by 35,000. The legislations main sponsor is Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.).
114th Congress (2015-2016) Refugees & Asylees
A+ (100%)
2015: Voted against the FY2016 Omnibus Spending bill to increase foreign guest workers Sen. Markey voted against H.R. 2029, the Omnibus Spending bill for 2016. This legislation would fully fund the refugee resettlement program and include increases in funding to accommodate Pres. Obamas proposal to resettle an additional 10,000 Syrian refugees in the United States in 2016.
113th Congress (2013-2014) Refugees & Asylees
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Refugees & Asylees
no action
111th Congress (2009-2010) Refugees & Asylees
no action
110th Congress (2007-2008) Refugees & Asylees
no action
2007: Voted against an amendment to reduce the time period of a countrys temporary protected status. Rep. Markey voted against the Forbes amendment to HR 2638, which would prohibit funds pursuant to this bill from being used to extend the temporary protected status designation of a country. This amendment failed 123-298.
109th Congress (2005-2006) Refugees & Asylees
no action
None
2005-2006: Voted for amendment (Nadler) to strip asylum reforms (H.R. 418)
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Nadler Amendment to H.R. 418 to strip asylum reforms that would prevent terrorists from gaming our asylum system. The Nadler Amendment would have stripped provisions to ensure that our asylum system is consistent with our justice system in which the trier of fact is always allowed to use the credibility of the defendant and witnesses in deciding the case. The Nadler Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), failed by a vote of 185-236 on February 10, 2005 (1:55 PM).
108th Congress (2003-2004) Refugees & Asylees
no action
2004: Voted against bill to reduce asylum fraud (Hastert)
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 10 that included a provision to reduce asylum fraud by reaffirming that the burden of proof is on the asylum claimant, and that the adjudicator may require corroborating evidence in certain cases. H.R. 10, sponsored by Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), passed by a vote of 282-134.
2004: Voted against reducing asylum fraud by voting in favor of amendment (Smith) to strip provision making it harder for terrorists to get asylum
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Smith Amendment to strip from H.R. 10 the asylum provision to make it harder for terrorists to receive asylum in the U.S. by no longer allowing aliens who allege they will be persecuted because of terrorist ties to automatically receive asylum based on that claim. The Smith Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Christopher Smith (R-N.J.), failed by a vote of 197-219.
2004: Voted in favor of a Motion to Recommit (Maloney) on H.R. 10 to strip provision to reduce asylum fraud
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Maloney Motion to Recommit with Instructions to strip from H.R. 10 a provision to reduce asylum fraud by reaffirming that the burden of proof is on the asylum claimant, and that the adjudicator may require corroborating evidence in certain cases. The Maloney Motion to Recommit, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), failed by a vote of 193-223.
2004: Voted in favor of amendment (Menendez) to H.R. 10 to strip provision to reduce asylum fraud
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Menendez Amendment to strip from H.R. 10 a provision to reduce asylum fraud by reaffirming that the burden of proof is on the asylum claimant, and that the adjudicator may require corroborating evidence in certain cases. The Menendez Amendment, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), failed by a vote of 203-213.
107th Congress (2001-2002) Refugees & Asylees
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Refugees & Asylees
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Refugees & Asylees
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Refugees & Asylees
F- (0%)
1996: Voted for an amendment which would have resulted in higher refugee admissions.
Rep. Markey voted for the Chrysler-Berman Amendment to H.R. 2202 (Smith) that stripped legal immigration reforms from the legislation. This was a vote against reducing annual refugee admissions, as recommended by the Barbara Jordan Commission. The amendment, sponsored by congressmen Chrysler, Berman and Brownback, passed by a vote of 238-183 and the comprehensive reforms were removed from the bill.
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Refugees & Asylees
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Refugees & Asylees
no action
0%
F-
Reduce Amnesty Enticements
119th Congress (2025-2026) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2025: (Jan. 20) Sen. Markey voted against the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to prevent a type of amnesty through abuse of parole.
The Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) included a provision giving legal standing to states to sue the federal government if it abuses its authority by giving parole (a form of amnesty) to classes of inadmissible aliens instead of on a case by case basis. (The bill passed the Senate 64-35 and passed the House 263-156.)
2025: (Jan. 17) Sen. Markey voted against cloture to allow the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to move to a final vote.
The Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) included a provision giving legal standing to states to sue the federal government if it abuses its authority by giving parole (a form of amnesty) to classes of inadmissible aliens instead of on a case by case basis. (The 61-35 vote allowed the Senate to proceed to the final floor vote.)
2025: (Jan. 15) Sen. Markey voted in favor of the Coons amendment (S.Amdt. 23) to the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to remove states' ability to sue the federal government for granting a type of mass amnesty through abuse of parole.
This amendment (by Chris Coons, D-DE) to the Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) would have stripped out the provision giving legal standing to states to sue the federal government if it abuses its authority by giving parole (a form of amnesty) to classes of inadmissible aliens instead of on a case by case basis. (The amendment failed 46-49.)
2025 (Jan. 09): Sen. Markey voted against the first cloture on the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to proceed to debate and amendments.
The Laken Riley Act (by Sen. Katie Britt, R-AL) included a provision giving legal standing to states to sue the federal government if it abuses its authority by granting mass parole (a form of amnesty) instead of on a case by case basis. Sixty votes were necessary to overcome a filibuster. (The cloture vote passed 84-9, allowing the Senate to proceed with amending the legislation.)
118th Congress (2023-2024) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2023: Sponsored S. 1392 to grant amnesty to illegal aliens who worked during COVID
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1392, the Citizenship for Essential Workers Act, introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). The legislation would grant Legal Permanent Residence to illegal aliens who held essential jobs, which includes most jobs, during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2023: Voted against S. Amdt. 110 to H.R. 3476 to prevent amnesties for illegal border crossers
Sen. Markey voted against S. Amdt. 110, offered by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) to H.R. 3476. S. Amdt. 110 would have added the House-passed H.R. 2 to the Debt Limit compromise bill. The legislation would reduce amnesty by strictly limiting the situations under which an administration can grant parole to illegal aliens.
117th Congress (2021-2022) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F (6%)
2021: Sponsored S. 1375, the Families Belong Together Act, to grant amnesty to certain individuals deported by Pres. Trump Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1375, the Families Belong Together Act, introduced by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). The legislation would grant amnesty to members of family unites who were deported as a result of Pres. Trumps zero tolerance policy. This would award green cards to approximately 6,000 individuals.
116th Congress (2019-2020) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2019: Cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR). The bill would severely limit the separation of families, lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement limiting the amount of time minors can be detained, remove the federal prohibition on taxpayer-funded council for illegal aliens, and increases the number of immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 2478, the Bahamas Temporary Protected Status Act of 2019, to grant TPS to Bahamians Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2478, the Bahamas Temporary Protected Status Act of 2019, introduced by Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ). The bill would grant Temporary Protected Status to Bahamians, including those present illegally at the time of enactment.
2019: Cosponsored S. 879, the Safe Environment from Countries Under Repression and Emergency Act, introduced by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 879, the Safe Environment from Countries Under Repression and Emergency Act. This legislation would give Legal Permanent Residency to all foreign citizens (mostly illegal aliens) who have received Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure, including those removed or deported pursuant to a voluntary departure order. Approximately 440,000 foreign citizens would receive LPR status under this bill.
2019: Cosponsored S. 456, the Liberian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act, introduced by Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 456, the Liberian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 2019. This legislation would grant Legal Permanent Resident status, with no offsets, to refugees from Liberia (with limited inadmissibility), as long as they have been in the United States since Nov. 20, 2014. They would be allowed to work and would be protected during the time their application is pending.
115th Congress (2017-2018) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2018: Voted in favor of the McCain-Coons amendment that would grant amnesty to illegal aliens Sen. Markey voted for an amendment offered by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Chris Coons (D-Del.) to the Senate shell bill for granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The McCain-Coons amendment would grant amnesty to an estimated 3.2 million young-adult illegal aliens. The amendment failed 52-to-47 (needed 60 votes to pass).
2018: Voted in favor of the Schumer-Collins-Rounds-King amendment that would grant amnesty to illegal aliens Sen. Markey voted for the amendment offered by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Angus King (I-Maine) to the Senate shell bill for granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The Schumer-Collins-Rounds-King amendment would have granted amnesty to an estimated 1.8 million young-adult illegal aliens and granted a defacto amnesty to another 850,000 illegal aliens by protecting them from deportations. The amendment failed 54-to-45 (needed 60 votes to pass).
114th Congress (2015-2016) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2015: Voted in favor of Attorney General nominee who supports amnesty Sen. Markey voted in favor of Loretta Lynchs confirmation as Attorney General. The Office of the Attorney General, the top law enforcement office in the country, is a position that should be reserved for qualified individuals with the utmost regard for the rule of law. Unfortunately, while Ms. Lynch served honorably as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, she indicated during the confirmation process that she did not have that regard for duly enacted immigration laws. She deemed reasonable President Obamas unprecedented and unconstitutional amnesties. Her dismissive attitude about the seriousness of enforcing immigration laws was largely explained in her initial answer to Senate questioning about whether the priority for U.S. jobs should be that they go to unlawfully present foreign workers or to legal workers of our nation. Ms. Lynch answered that everybody should be getting U.S. jobs regardless of their legal status, despite the fact that the primary purpose of immigration laws is to protect vulnerable American workers. As a result, NumbersUSA took an unusual step and scored the vote for the confirmation of Ms. Lynch as a vote against against the rule of law, and against the interests of American workers. Ms. Lynch was confirmed by a vote of 56 to 43.
2015: Voted in FAVOR OF McConnell substitute amendment to H.R. 240 to fund Executive Amnesties Sen. Markey voted in FAVOR OF the McConnell amendment to substitute the text of HR 240 with language that would provide full and unrestricted funding for President Obamas unconstitutional and illegal Executive Amnesties. After a series of 4 failed attempts to invoke cloture and move to debate on H.R. 240 (the House-passed DHS Appropriations bill that included language to de-fund Pres. Obamas Executive Amnesties), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) struck a deal with Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to move a clean DHS bill that would fund the amnesties through September 2015. Voting in favor of the McConnell substitute amendment was a vote against protecting struggling American workers who will have to compete for scarce jobs with millions of unlawful immigrants. It was also a vote to cede Congress constitutional powers to a President who has shown absolute disdain for the rule of law and the separation of powers at the very core of our Constitution. Senators cannot expect the judicial branch to reclaim the legislative powers for which they are unwilling to fight. The McConnell Amendment passed by a vote of 66 to 33.
2015: Voted FOR Executive Amnesty by voting against Sessions/Lee motion to allow possibility of de-funding Executive Amnesty in DHS Appropriations Sen. Markey voted against the Sessions/Lee motion to table the amendment tree on H.R. 240. After a series of 4 failed attempts to invoke cloture and move to debate on H.R. 240 (the House-passed DHS Appropriations bill that included language to de-fund Pres. Obamas Executive Amnesties), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) struck a deal with Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to move a clean DHS bill that would fund the amnesties through September 2015. As part of this deal, Majority Leader McConnell filled the amendment tree in order to provide full funding for President Obamas unconstitutional and illegal amnesties and block all other amendments to H.R. 240. This was especially outrageous given that Leader McConnell promised to restore regular order and an open amendment process when he became Senate Leader in January 2015. In response, Senators Sessions (R-AL) and Lee (R-UT) filed a motion to table the amendment tree, thus allowing amendments to the bill and the possibility of restoring the de-funding language. Thus, a vote against the Sessions/Lee motion to table the amendment tree was a vote for amnesty and lawlessness a vote against the open process. The Sessions/Lee motion to table failed by a vote of 34 to 65.
2015: Voted against SECOND Motion to bring H.R. 240 (DHS Appropriations bill) to de-fund Executive Amnesty to Senate floor Sen. Markey voted against the SECOND cloture motion to allow the Senate to begin debate on the House-passed DHS Appropriations bill (H.R. 240) that includes language to de-fund President Obamas Executive Amnesties, including DACA and his November 2014 amnesty to give work permits to up to 5 million illegal aliens. DHS funding runs out at the end of February 2015 and President Obama has threatened to veto any appropriations bill that includes language to de-fund his amnesties, essentially saying his amnesty is more important than funding for DHS. No Senate Democrats voted to allow the bill to the Senate floor for debate. The motion failed by a vote of 53 - 47 (60 votes required for passage).
2015: Voted against THIRD Motion to bring H.R. 240 (DHS Appropriations bill) to de-fund Executive Amnesty to Senate floor Sen. Markey voted against the THIRD cloture motion to allow the Senate to begin debate on the House-passed DHS Appropriations bill (H.R. 240) that includes language to de-fund President Obamas Executive Amnesties, including DACA and his November 2014 amnesty to give work permits to up to 5 million illegal aliens. DHS funding runs out at the end of February 2015 and President Obama has threatened to veto any appropriations bill that includes language to de-fund his amnesties, essentially saying his amnesty is more important than funding for DHS. No Senate Democrats voted to allow the bill to the Senate floor for debate. The motion failed by a vote of 52 - 47 (60 votes required for passage).
2015: Voted against FIRST Motion to Proceed to Debate on DHS Appropriations bill (H.R. 240) to de-fund Executive Amnesty Sen. Markey voted against a cloture motion to allow the Senate to begin debate on the House-passed DHS Appropriations bill (H.R. 240) that includes language to de-fund President Obamas Executive Amnesties, including DACA and his November 2014 amnesty to give work permits to up to 5 million illegal aliens. DHS funding runs out at the end of February 2015 and President Obama has threatened to veto any appropriations bill that includes language to de-fund his amnesties, essentially saying his amnesty is more important than funding for DHS. No Senate Democrats voted to allow the bill to the Senate floor for debate. The motion failed by a vote of 51-48.
2015: Voted AGAINST FOURTH Motion to Proceed to Debate on DHS Appropriations bill (H.R. 240) to defund Executive Amnesty Sen. Markey voted AGAINST cloture to allow the Senate to proceed to debate on H.R. 240, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill that includes language to de-fund President Obamas Executive Amnesties, including DACA and his November 2014 amnesty that would provide legal status and work permits for up to 5 million illegal aliens. The House of Representatives passed H.R. 240 in January 2015 by a vote of 236-191. Despite campaign statements from several Democratic Senators in November 2014 opposing Executive Amnesty, none of the Senate Democrats voted to allow the bill to come to the Senate floor for debate because it contains language de-funding the amnesties. President Obama has repeatedly said he will veto any legislation that defunds his Executive Amnesties, including a DHS Appropriations bill. As a reminder, DHS was only funded on a short-term (3 months) basis during the CROmnibus spending fight in December 2014 to allow Republicans to attempt to de-fund Executive Amnesty once they took control of the House and Senate in the 114th Congress. DHS funding runs out at the end of February 2015 unless the Senate passes an Appropriations bill and sends it to the Presidents desk, forcing him to decide if he will shut down DHS funding in order to protect his Executive Amnesties. The vote on the FOURTH motion to proceed to debate failed by a vote of 47 - 46 (60 votes required for passage).
113th Congress (2013-2014) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2014: Voted Against Blocking Obamas Mass Amnesty Sen. Markey voted against the Point of Order raised by Sen. Ted Cruz as to the constitutionality of the executive amnesty issued by President Obama. Doing so during a vote on H.R. 83, the CROmnibus, acted as a vote to stop this unlawful amnesty, and a vote against Sen. Cruzs Point of Order was a vote in favor of the presidents amnesty.
None
112th Congress (2011-2012) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
no action
111th Congress (2009-2010) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2010: Voted for the DREAM Act amnesty, which would have rewarded illegal aliens with amnesty.
The DREAM Act would have granted amnesty to illegal aliens under the age of 30 who have been in the United States for five consecutive years and came illegally to the United States before the age of 16. Such a reward for illegal immigration serves as an incentive for more illegal immigration. Fortunately, the DREAM Act did not pass.
2009-2010: Cosponsored the DREAM Act, which rewards illegal aliens with amnesty (Berman).
Rep. Markey is a cosponsor of H.R. 1741, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act of 2007. H.R. 1741 would grant amnesty to illegal aliens under the age of 35 who have been in the United States for five consecutive years and came (illegally) to the United States before the age of 16. Such a reward for illegal immigration serves as an incentive for more illegal immigration. Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) is the main sponsor of this bill.
110th Congress (2007-2008) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
no action
109th Congress (2005-2006) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
no action
2006: Voted against an amendment that denies temporary amnesty for certain Central Americans.
Rep. Markey voted against the Tancredo Amendment to H.R. 5441, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill of 2007. The Tancredo Amendment would prohibit funds appropriated by H.R. 5441 from being used to administer extensions of the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) amnesty for Guatemalans, Hondurans, or Nicaraguans. The Tancredo Amendment failed by a vote of 134-284.
108th Congress (2003-2004) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2003-2004: Cosponsored bill to reward illegal aliens with amnesty (Diaz-Balart).
Rep. Markey cosponsored H.R. 2843, an amnesty for illegal aliens from Perus and Colombia. Amnesties have been shown to increase rates of illegal immigration. Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Belart (R-Fla.) was the primary sponsor.
2003-2004: Cosponsored a bill to reward college-age illegal aliens with amnesty (Cannon).
H.R. 1684 was a defacto amnesty to grant legal status to certain college-age illegal aliens who would qualify to receive in-state tuition rates. An estimated 500,000 to 600,000 illegal aliens would have qualified for this amnesty. This bills primary sponsor was Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah).
107th Congress (2001-2002) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
2002: Voted for a resolution to reward illegal immigrants with the Section 245(i) amnesty.
Rep. Markey voted for H RES 365, a four-month extension of Section 245(i), an amnesty for illegal aliens that rewards illegal immigrants with residency by allowing certain illegal aliens to pay a 1,000 fine, to apply for a green card in this country, and to stay without fear of deportation. H RES 365, sponsored by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), passed by a vote of 275 to 137.
2001-2002: Voted for a bill to extend an illegal immigrant amnesty act (Gekas).
Rep. Markey voted to reward illegal immigrants with amnesty by voting in favor of H.R. 1885, or a four-month extension of Section 245(i). The bills primary sponsor was Rep. George Gekas (R-Penn).
106th Congress (1999-2000) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
1999-2000: cosponsored bill to pass another amnesty (Gutierrez).
Rep. Markey cosponsored H.R.36, which would have rewarded approximately one million illegal aliens from Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and Haiti, including their spouses and children, with a direct path to U.S. citizenship. The main sponsor of this bill was Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.).
105th Congress (1997-1998) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
F- (0%)
1997-1998: Voted against a motion to strip an amensty from a bill.
Rep. Markey voted against the Rohrabacher Motion to H.R. 2267 to kill the Section 245(i) amnesty that allowed certain illegal aliens to pay a fee and avoid a 1996 laws provision that punishes illegal aliens by barring them for 10 years from entering the U.S. on a legal visa as a student, tourist, worker or immigrant. The Rohrabacher Motion, sponsored by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), failed by a vote of 153-268.
104th Congress (1995-1996) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
no action
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Reduce Amnesty Enticements
no action
No Action
Limit Birthright Citizenship
119th Congress (2025-2026) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
117th Congress (2021-2022) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
116th Congress (2019-2020) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
115th Congress (2017-2018) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
114th Congress (2015-2016) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
113th Congress (2013-2014) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
111th Congress (2009-2010) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
110th Congress (2007-2008) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
109th Congress (2005-2006) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
108th Congress (2003-2004) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
107th Congress (2001-2002) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Limit Birthright Citizenship
no action
10%
F
Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
119th Congress (2025-2026) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
117th Congress (2021-2022) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
F (6%)
2022: Sponsored S. 4204 to extend Medicare benefits to illegal aliens Sen. Markey sponsored S. 4204, the Medicare for All Act, introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.). The legislation would allow illegal aliens living in the United States to have access to Medicare benefits. However, it would allow the federal government to create a rule to deny coverage to anyone who comes to the U.S. for the sole purpose of accessing the benefit.
2021: Sponsored S. 2081 to expand Pell Grants to illegal aliens Sen. Markey sponsored S. 2081, the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act of 2021, introduced by Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). The legislation would extend federal Pell grants to illegal aliens who qualify under the Dream Act.
2021: Voted against Amdt. 54 to S. Con. Res. 5 to block stimulus payments to illegal aliens Sen. Markey voted against Amendment #54, introduced by Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.), to S. Con. Res. 5, the 2021 COVID-19 stimulus bill. The amendment would have blocked stimulus payments from going to illegal aliens. The amendment was approved 58-42.
116th Congress (2019-2020) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
F (6%)
2019: Cosponsored S. 1095, the American Dream Employment Act, introduced by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1095, the American Dream Employment Act of 2019. This legislation would provide recipients of the DACA executive amnesty with housing and jobs within the United States Senate.
115th Congress (2017-2018) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
114th Congress (2015-2016) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
113th Congress (2013-2014) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
111th Congress (2009-2010) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
F (6%)
2009: Voted against allowing consideration of verification amendments to the health care reform bill Rep. Markey voted in favor of the rule to H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Despite high publicity about the big loopholes in the bill allowing illegal aliens to participate in many parts of the new federal healthcare plan, the Rules Committee brought a rule to the House floor that blocked a vote on any amendment giving the Members a chance to close the loopholes. NumbersUSA notified the Members of Congress that a vote FOR the closed rule would be graded as a vote to provide rewards and incentives for illegal immigration. In particular, the rule prevented the House from considering the Heller, Deal, and Wilson verification amendments to the bill. By supporting the rule, Rep. Markey signaled his/her support of a health bill that creates rewards or incentives for illegal immigration. The rule passed 242-192 (7 Nov. 09; 1:33 PM).
2009-2010: Voted against a committee amendment to prevent illegal aliens from accessing taxpayer-funded health care.
Rep. Markey voted against the Deal amendment to H.R. 3200 in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which would have prevented illegal aliens from receiving free taxpayer-funded health care. The promise of free health care induces many individuals to come to this country illegally and encourages illegal aliens to remain in the United States. The amendment failed 28-29. By opposing this amendment, Rep. Markey supported the right of illegal aliens to receive health care intended for U.S. citizens and authorized legal aliens.
2009-2010: Cosponsored the DREAM Act, which rewards illegal aliens with amnesty and in-state tuition (Berman).
Rep. Markey is a cosponsor of H.R. 1741, the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors [DREAM] Act of 2007. H.R. 1741 would grant illegal aliens permanent resident status and allow them to pay in-state tuition at Americas public colleges and universities. Such a reward for illegal immigration serves as an incentive for more illegal immigration. Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) is the main sponsor of this bill.
110th Congress (2007-2008) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
C- (40%)
2008: Voted for an amendment to prevent illegal aliens from receiving federal housing funds.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of an amendment to H.R. 5818, the Neighborhood Stabilization Act of 2008. This amendment would prevent illegal aliens from receiving Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds pursuant to this act. The amendment passed by a vote of 391-33.
2008: Voted for an amendment to restrict funding to businesses that hire illegal aliens.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of an amendment to HR 5819 that would prohibit SBIR or STTR awards from going to a small business concern if an unlawful alien has an ownership interest in that concern or in a concern that has interest in the small business. The amendment also prohibits SBIR and STTR awards from going to businesses that have repeatedly hired, recruited, or referred unlawful aliens. The amendment passed by a vote of 406-0, with 3 present.
2007-2008: Voted against an amendment to prohibit Social Security funds from being used to administer benefits accrued from work performed in Mexico.
Rep. Markey voted against the Gingrey amendment to HR 3043, an amendment to prohibit the use of funds by the SSA to administer Social Security benefit payments, under any agreement between the United States and Mexico establishing totalization arrangements between the two countries. The amendment passed 254-168.
2007-2008: Voted to allow illegal aliens to vote in union elections.
Rep. Markey voted against a Motion to Recommit H.R. 800, the Employee Free Choice Act of 2007. The Motion to Recommit would have recommitted H.R. 800 to the Committee on Education and Labor with instructions to report the bill back to the House with an amendment that would require that all employees allowed to vote in union elections be citizens or legal residents of the United States. Although some Representatives voted against the Motion to Recommit because it would have delayed final passage of the bill, a vote in favor of the Motion to Recommit was clearly a vote in favor of interior enforcement and against allowing illegal aliens to vote in union elections. The Motion to Recommit failed by a vote of 202-225.
109th Congress (2005-2006) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
D (28%)
2005-2006: Voted for an amendment to aid states in conforming with minimum federally-mandated license standards.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Obey amendment to H.R. 2360 to provide $100 million to fund grants under the REAL ID Act to assist States in conforming with minimum drivers? license standards. The Obey amendment passed by a vote of 226-198.
2005: Voted against the Rule that incorporated the Managers Amendment to H.R. 418 to reduce rewards for illegal immigration Rep. Markey voted against the Rule that incorporated the Managers Amendment to H.R. 418 to strike both the section of the bill that explicitly recognizes states ability to issue driving certificates that do not comply with the standards
2005: Voted against H.R. 418 to reduce rewards for illegal immigration Rep. Markey voted against legal presence requirement that would make illegal aliens ineligible for drivers licenses. As well
108th Congress (2003-2004) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
F- (0%)
2004: Voted against bill to prohibit drivers licenses for illegal aliens (Hastert)
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 10 that included provisions to set federal standards for the issuance of drivers licenses and birth certificates. H.R. 10 prohibited issuance of drivers licenses to illegal aliens and required that drivers licenses of temporary visa holders expire when their visa expires. As well, H.R. 10 contained provisions to prohibit the use of consular-issued ID cards. H.R. 10, sponsored by Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), passed by a vote of 282-134.
2004: Voted in favor of a Motion to Recommit (Maloney) on H.R. 10 to prohibit issuance of drivers licenses to illegal aliens
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Maloney Motion to Recommit with Instructions to strip from H.R. 10 a provision to set federal standards for the issuance of drivers licenses and birth certificates. H.R. 10 prohibited the issuance of drivers licenses to illegal aliens and required that drivers licenses of temporary visa holders expire when their visa expires. As well, H.R. 10 contains provisions to prohibit the use of consular-issued ID cards. The Maloney Motion to Recommit, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), failed by a vote of 193-223.
2004: Voted in favor of amendment (Menendez) to H.R. 10 to strip provisions prohibiting issuance of drivers licenses for illegal aliens
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Menendez Amendment to strip from H.R. 10 a provision to set federal standards for the issuance of drivers licenses and birth certificates. H.R. 10 prohibited the issuance of drivers licenses to illegal aliens and required that drivers licenses of temporary visa holders expire when their visa expires. As well, H.R. 10 contained provisions to prohibit the use of consular-issued ID cards. The Menendez Amendment, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), failed by a vote of 203-213.
2004: Voted for amendment (Oxley) allowing use of foreign ID cards in U.S.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Oxley Amendment to strip the Culberson Amendment from H.R. 5025. The Culberson Amendment would have prohibited the use of matricula consular ID cards. The Oxley Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Mike Oxley (R-Ohio), passed by a vote of 222-177.
2004: Voted against amendment (Hayworth) and in favor of rewarding illegal aliens with Social Security benefits.
Rep. Markey voted against the Hayworth Amendment to H.R. 5006 that would have effectively prevented the U.S.-Mexico totalization agreement from taking effect, and, as a result, prevented Social Security payments to illegal aliens from Mexico. The amendment, sponsored by Rep. J. D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.), failed by a vote of 178-225.
2003-2004: Voted against an amendment to fight the use of foreign IDs.
Rep. Markey voted against the Hostettler Amendment to put some major restrictions on consular-issued ID cards that are frequently issued to illegal aliens by foreign governments. These cards make it easier for illegal aliens to gain government services and to otherwise profit from their illegal activity. The Hostettler, sponsored by Rep. John Hostettler (R-Ind.), Amendment passed by a vote of 226-198.
2003-2004: Cosponsored bill to grant amnesty to college-age illegal aliens (Cannon).
H.R. 1684 would have rewarded illegal immigration by adjusting the status of certain college-age illegal aliens to legal permanent resident for the purpose of receiving in-state college tuition rates. This bills primary sponsor was Rep. Chris Cannon (R-Utah).
107th Congress (2001-2002) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
F (6%)
1996: Voted against bill denying illegal aliens in-state tuition (Smith)
Rep. Markey voted against H.R. 2202 that denied illegal aliens in-state tuition, in addition to almost all forms of federal welfare. The primary sponsor was Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas).
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards
no action
6%
F
Strengthen Border Security
119th Congress (2025-2026) Strengthen Border Security
F- (0%)
Sen. Markey voted against the FY 2025 Budget Resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) to fund border security.
The Senate-amended FY 2025 Budget Resolution (by Jodey Arrington, R-TX) provides between $175 - 200 billion for immigration enforcement, including border wall construction and additional agents. (The resolution passed the Senate 51-48 and later passed the House 216-214).
Sen. Markey co-sponsored the NO BAN Act (S. 391) to strictly limit presidential authority to limit or halt immigration.
The NO BAN Act (by Chris Coons, D-DE) would strictly limit the president’s broad authority found under 8 USC 1182(f) to stop immigration. The authority was used to limit travel into the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic and limit travel by citizens of and visitors to terrorist-producing countries.
Sen. Markey voted against the FY 2025 Budget Resolution (S. Con. Res. 7) to fund border security.
The FY 2025 Budget Resolution (by Lindsey Graham, R-SC) is the first step towards passing the House proposal to provide $200 billion for immigration enforcement, including border wall construction and additional agents. (The resolution passed the Senate 52-48, setting up a conference with the House).
Sen. Markey co-sponsored the Access to Counsel Act (S. 391) to provide time for illegal border crossers to access legal counsel.
The Access to Counsel Act (by Alex Padilla, D-CA) would require a time period for aliens at ports of entry to access counsel, effectively slowing down crossing at ports of entry for everyone.
118th Congress (2023-2024) Strengthen Border Security
F- (0%)
2023: Voted against S. Amdt. 110 to H.R. 3476 to strengthen border security
Sen. Markey against S. Amdt. 110, offered by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) to H.R. 3476. S. Amdt. 110 would have added the House-passed H.R. 2 to the Debt Limit compromise bill. The legislation would require DHS to restart border wall construction that has been authorized for and paid for by Congress and strengthen the Secure Fence Act of 2006 by requiring physical barriers along 900 miles of border. The legislation also provides retention bonuses for Border Patrol agents and defunds efforts to resettle illegal border crossers across the country.
2023: Sponsored S. 342 to allow illegal border crossers to have access to council
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 342, the Access to Counsel Act, introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). The legislation would require a time period for aliens at port of entry to access counsel, effective slowing down crossing at ports of entry for everyone.
117th Congress (2021-2022) Strengthen Border Security
F- (0%)
2021: Sponsored S. 1912 to slow down processing at ports of entry Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1912, the Access to Counsel Act of 2021, introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). The legislation would require a time period for anyone deemed to be inadmissible at a port of entry access to counsel. Doing so would significantly clog ports of entry.
2021: Voted against Amdt. 872 to S. Con. Res. 5 to fund border security and interior enforcement Sen. Markey voted against Amendment #872, introduced by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), to S. Con. Res. 5, the 2021 COVID-19 stimulus bill. The amendment would have provided funding for border security and interior enforcement. The amendment failed 50-50.
2021: Voted against Amdt. 651 to S. Con. Res. 5 to end catch-and-release Sen. Markey voted against Amendment #651, introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), to S. Con. Res. 5, the 2021 COVID-19 stimulus bill. The amendment would have ended the practice of catch-and-release at the border. The amendment failed 50-50.
2021: Voted against Amdt. 542 to S. Con. Res. 5 to provide border fence funding Sen. Markey voted against Amendment #542, introduced by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.), to S. Con. Res. 5, the 2021 COVID-19 stimulus bill. The amendment would have provided funding for border fence construction. The amendment failed 50-50.
2022: Voted against S.J. Res. 46 to disapprove of asylum rule Sen. Markey voted in favor of S.J.Res. 46 introduced by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.). The legislation would formally disapprove of the Biden Administration rule to allow asylum officers to grant asylum to illegal border crossers at the border.
2021: Voted against Amdt. 687 to S. Con. Res. 5 to reinstate the Remain in Mexico policy Sen. Markey voted against Amendment #687, introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), to S. Con. Res. 5, the 2021 COVID-19 stimulus bill. The amendment would have reinstated the Migrant Protection Protocols, commonly known as the Remain in Mexico policy. The amendment failed 50-50.
116th Congress (2019-2020) Strengthen Border Security
F- (0%)
2019: Cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR). The bill would severely limit the separation of families, lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement limiting the amount of time minors can be detained, remove the federal prohibition on taxpayer-funded council for illegal aliens, and increases the number of immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1733, the Protecting Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, to encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1733, the Protecting Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). The bill would: 1) prevent the separation of families within 100 miles of the border, 2) call for limited detention of family units, 3) lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement that requires the feds to release minors within 20 days, 4) appoint taxpayer-funded attorneys for UACs in removal proceedings, and add 75 immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1894, the Alternatives to Detention Act of 2019, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1894, the Alternatives to Detention Act of 2019, introduced by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV). The bill would expand Alternatives to Detention (ATD) to aliens who are members of a vulnerable population and defines vulnerable population as nearly every one.
2019: Cosponsored S. 534, the Protecting Disaster Relief Funds Act, introduced by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-N.Y.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 534, the Protecting Disaster Relief Funds Act of 2019. This legislation would block certain funds from being used for President Trumps border wall, these funds included primarily disaster relief funds, as well as funds given to the Army Corps of Engineers.
2019: Cosponsored S. 326, the RAIDER Act, introduced by Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 326, the RAIDER Act. This legislation would block President Trumps national emergency and block the construction of the border wall.
115th Congress (2017-2018) Strengthen Border Security
F- (0%)
2018: Voted in favor of the Schumer-Collins-Rounds-King amendment that would weaken border security Sen. Markey voted for the amendment offered by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Angus King (I-Maine) to the Senate shell bill for granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The Schumer-Collins-Rounds-King amendment would have appropriated some funding for border security, but limited the ability of Customs and Border Patrols role in enforcement. The amendment failed 54-to-45 (needed 60 votes to pass).
2017: Cosponsored legislation nullifying Pres. Trumps border security EO (Carper) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 725. This legislation would nullify Pres. Trumps Jan. 25, 2017 executive order that improves border security and strengthens interior enforcement. The bills main sponsor is Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE).
114th Congress (2015-2016) Strengthen Border Security
no action
2015: Voted against McCain amdt to S. Con. Res. 11 to support expedited removal of illegal aliens Sen. Markey voted against the McCain amendment to the Senate Budget Resolution, S. Con. Res 11. Sen. McCains original amendment called for the expedited removal of unaccompanied minors from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. Those three countries were the source of the unprecedented border surge along the U.S.-Mexico border during the summer of 2014. But his original amendment also included a provision that would allow for the creation of in-country processing of refugees in those three countries. After NumbersUSA pointed out to Senators that the Central American migrants are not fleeing government persecution, and so do not qualify as refugees, but are instead seeking the benefits of the Presidents rewriting of our immigration law, Sen. McCain removed the in-country processing language, and NumbersUSA supported the amendment. Since the amendment was part of a Budget Resolution, it is non-binding and doesnt force a change in the current policy that allows unaccompanied minors from those three countries to be treated differently than those from Mexico or Canada. If the provision, however, remains in the budget resolution thats eventually approved by both chambers of Congress, it allows appropriators later to set spending levels for the 2016 fiscal year that call for the expedited removal of illegal aliens from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. The amendment passed 58-to-42 (including the support of three Democrats and one Independent also Sens. Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Angus King of Maine, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, and Claire McCaskill of Missouri.
113th Congress (2013-2014) Strengthen Border Security
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Strengthen Border Security
B- (66%)
2012: Voted in favor of an amendment to hamstring border enforcement in 2012 (Grijalva) Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Grijalva amendment to H.R. 2578, legislation to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This amendment would have stripped provisions that allow the Border Patrol to bypass regulations put in place by the Department of Interior and Department of Agriculture on federal lands within 100 miles of the border. The amendments sponsor is Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and it failed 177-247 (19 June 2012).
2012: Supported an amendment to place cell towers on the border (Poe) Rep. Markey supported the Poe Amendment to the FY2013 DHS Appropriations Bill. This amendment would allocate funding for the building of cell phone towers along stretches of the U.S. - Mexico border so that Border Patrol agents and others in trouble can call law enforcement for assistance. The amendment passed by a vote of 302-113 (6 June 2012).
2011: Supported an amendment to build cell phone towers along the U.S. - Mexico border (Poe) Rep. Markey supported the Poe Amendment to the FY 2012 DHS Appropriations Bill. This amendment would allocate funding for the building of cell phone towers along stretches of the U.S. - Mexico border so that Border Patrol agents and others in trouble can call law enforcement for assistance. The amendment passed by a vote of 327-93 (1 June 2011).
111th Congress (2009-2010) Strengthen Border Security
no action
2009-2010: Voted against an amendment to deter illegal immigration and drug smuggling by removing lookout posts for smugglers.
Rep. Markey voted against the King amendment (250) to H.R. 2892, the 2010 DHS appropriations bill. This amendment requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement to remove the lookout posts constructed by drug smugglers, thereby making it more difficult for drug smugglers and reducing illegal immigration associated with illegal drug activity. This amendment passed 240-187-1. Rep. Markeys vote was one to continue allowing illegal drugs and aliens across our border.
110th Congress (2007-2008) Strengthen Border Security
F (6%)
2008: Has not Signed Discharge Petition to move H.R. 4088, a bill to increase border security Rep. Markey has not signed the Discharge Petition on H.R. 4088, the SAVE Act, to increase border security. If the petition collects 218 signatures, a simple majority, the bill can bypass the committee process and be placed on the House floor for a vote.
2007-2008: Voted against an amendment to increase funding for the construction of a border fence.
Rep. Markey voted against the Brown-Waite amendment to HR 2638. This amendment re-directs $89 million set to be appropriated to the Undersecretary for Managements account to the Border Security Fencing, Infrastructure, and Technology Account, with a view towards constructing at least 700 miles of fencing along the southern border. The amendment was adopted 241-179.
109th Congress (2005-2006) Strengthen Border Security
F- (2%)
2006: Voted for a bill to prevent border tunnels.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 4830, the Border Tunnel Protection Act of 2006 to penalize any person who constructs or uses a border tunnel. H.R. 4830 passed by a vote of 422 to 0.
2006: Voted against border fence Rep. Markey voted against H.R. 6061 to create a 700 mile reinforced fence along the U.S.-Mexico border, and to provide for other barriers for border control. H.R. 6061 passed by a vote of 283-138-1 (1 denotes a vote of present.) on September 14, 2006.
2005-2006: Voted against an amendment that requires complete execution of the previously instituted entry-exit system.
Rep. Markey voted against the Sullivan Amendment to H.R. 4437 to require full implementation of the automated entry-exit system that was instituted by Congress in 1996. As well, the Sullivan Amendment would have provided for expedited removal of most illegal aliens. The Sullivan Amendment failed by a vote of 163 to 251.
2005-2006: Voted against a bill to build 700 miles of a border fence.
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 4437 which included provisions to create 700 miles of border fencing along the Mexican border and to require implementation of the entry-exit system. H.R. 4437 was passed by the House by a vote of 239 to 182.
2005-2006: Voted against an amendment to reinforce physical structures, including fences, to keep illegal aliens out.
Rep. Markey voted against the Hunter Amendment to H.R. 4437. The Hunter Amendment would shore up security by building fences and other physical infrastructure to keep out illegal aliens. The Hunter Amendment passed by a vote of 260-159.
2005-2006: Voted against amendment (Goode) to H.R. 1815 to authorize troops on the border
Rep. Markey voted against authorizing the Secretary of Defense to assign members of the military, under certain conditions, to assist in the performance of border control functions. H. Amdt. 206, sponsored by Rep. Virgil Goode (R-Va.), passed the House by a vote of 245-184.
None
108th Congress (2003-2004) Strengthen Border Security
F (10%)
2004: Voted against bill to increase the number of Border Patrol agents (Hastert)
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 10 that included provisions to increase the number of Border Patrol agents by 2,000 a year for 5 years and to increase the number of ICE inspectors by 1,600 a year for 5 years. As well H.R. 10 contained provisions aimed at better screening of airline passengers before they enter the U.S. H.R. 10, sponsored by Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), passed by a vote of 282-134.
2004: Voted in favor of amendment (Souder) to H.R. 10 to help security screeners reduce illegal immigration
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Souder Amendment to H.R. 10 to give all security screening personnel access to law enforcement and intelligence information maintained by DHS. The Souder Amendment sought to help security screeners identify and stop illegal aliens. The Souder Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Mark Souder (R-Ind.), passed by a vote of 410-0.
2004: Voted against amendment (Ose) to H.R. 10 to increase border control with border fence
Rep. Markey voted against the Ose Amendment to ensure completion of the last 14 miles of the San Diego border fence. This would serve as a physical barrier to additional illegal immigration. The Ose Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Doug Ose (R-Calif.), passed by a vote of 252-160.
2004: Voted in favor of a Motion to Recommit (Maloney) on H.R. 10 to strip provisions to increase border security
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Maloney Motion to Recommit with Instructions to strip from H.R. 10 provisions to increase the number of Border Patrol agents by 2,000 a year for 5 years and to increase the number of ICE inspectors by 1,600 a year for 5 years. As well H.R. 10 contained provisions aimed at better screening of airline passengers before they enter the U.S. The Maloney Motion to Recommit, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), failed by a vote of 193-223.
2004: Voted in favor of amendment (Menendez) to H.R. 10 to strip provisions reducing illegal immigration with border security
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Menendez Amendment to strip from H.R. 10 provisions to increase the number of Border Patrol agents by 2,000 a year for 5 years and to increase the number of ICE inspectors by 1,600 a year for 5 years. As well H.R. 10 contained provisions aimed at better screening of airline passengers before they enter the U.S. The Menendez Amendment, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), failed by a vote of 203-213.
None
2003-2004: Voted against an amendment (Goode) to authorize the use of the military to assist in border control.
Rep. Markey voted against the Goode Amendment to H.R. 1588 (Duncan) authorizing members of the military, under certain circumstances, to assist in border control efforts. The Goode Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Virgil Goode (R-Va.), passed the House by a vote of 250-179.
107th Congress (2001-2002) Strengthen Border Security
F (6%)
2002: Voted against an amendment to authorize the use of the military in border control efforts.
Rep. Markey voted against H. Amdt. 479 to H.R. 4546 to authorize the Secretary of Defense to assign members of the military to assist in border control efforts. The amendment passed 232-183.
2001-2002: Voted against the Traficant Amendment to authorize the use of troops on the border.
Rep. Markey voted against authorizing the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury to request that members of the Armed Forces assist the INS with border control efforts. The Traficant Amendment to H.R. 2586, sponsored by Rep. James Traficant (D-Ohio), passed by a vote of 242-173.
106th Congress (1999-2000) Strengthen Border Security
F (6%)
1999-2000: Voted against the Traficant Amendment to authorize the use of the military on the border.
Rep. Markey voted against authorizing the Secretary of Defense, under certain circumstances, to assign members of the military to assit the Border Patrol in their efforts. The Traficant Amendment to H.R. 1401, sponsored by Rep. James Traficant (D-Ohio), passed by a vote of 242-181.
105th Congress (1997-1998) Strengthen Border Security
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Strengthen Border Security
F- (0%)
1996: Voted against a bill to reduce illegal immigration with border control, such as increased Border Patrol forces.
Rep. Markey voted against H.R. 2202, a large omnibus bill with dozens of provisions aimed at reducing illegal immigration. It included major increases in Border Patrol forces. As well, it barred from any kind of legal entry for 10 years any illegal alien who had been previously apprehended and deported. H.R. 2202, sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), passed by a vote of 333-87.
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Strengthen Border Security
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Strengthen Border Security
no action
10%
F
Strengthen Interior Enforcement
119th Congress (2025-2026) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F- (0%)
Sen. Markey voted against the FY 2025 Budget Resolution (H. Con. Res. 14) to fund interior enforcement.
The Senate-amended FY 2025 Budget Resolution (by Jodey Arrington, R-TX) provides between $175 - 200 billion for immigration enforcement, including the government's ability to detain and remove people who are not admissible to the United States. (The resolution passed the Senate 51-48 and later passed the House 216-214).
Sen. Markey co-sponsored the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act (S. 455) to strictly limit where ICE can enforce the law.
The Protecting Sensitive Locations Act (by Richard Blumenthal, D-CT) would prohibit ICE from detaining illegal aliens in certain locations.
Sen. Markey voted against the FY 2025 Budget Resolution (S. Con. Res. 7) to fund interior enforcement.
The FY 2025 Budget Resolution (by Lindsey Graham, R-SC) is the first step towards passing the House proposal to provide $200 billion for immigration enforcement, including the government's ability to detain and remove people who are not admissible to the United States. (The resolution passed the Senate 52-48, setting up a conference with the House).
2025: (Jan. 20) Sen. Markey voted against the Ernst amendment (S.Amdt. 8) to the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to expand the list of offenses that would require mandatory detention.
The amendment (by Joni Ernst, R-IA) to The Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) added "assault of a law enforcement officer" and "any crime that results in death or serious bodily injury to another person" to the list of offenses requiring mandatory detention. (The amendment passed 75-24 and was included in the final bill.)
2025: (Jan. 20) Sen. Markey voted against the Laken Riley Act (S.5) to strengthen detention requirements and give states the ability to sue the federal government for not enforcing immigration laws.
The Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) included a provision to require the detention of aliens who have been convicted or arrested for various forms of theft, assault, and bodily harm; also included provisions to give legal standing to states to sue the federal government for 1) violating "detention and removal requirements"; 2) releasing aliens that go on to harm the state or its residents; and 3) violating the requirement to discontinue visas to countries who refuse to take their citizens back. The bill passed the Senate 64-35 and passed the House 263-156.
2025: (Jan. 17) Sen. Markey voted against cloture to allow the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to move to a final vote.
The Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) included a provision to require the detention of aliens who have been convicted or arrested for various forms of theft (burglary, larceny & shoplifting); also included provisions to give legal standing to states to sue the federal government for 1) violating "detention and removal requirements"; 2) releasing aliens that go on to harm the state or its residents; and 3) violating the requirement to discontinue visas to countries who refuse to take their citizens back. (The 61-35 vote allowed the Senate to proceed to the final floor vote.)
2025: (Jan. 15) Sen. Markey voted in favor of the Coons amendment (S.Amdt.23) to the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to remove states' ability to sue the federal government for failing to enforce immigration laws.
This amendment (by Chris Coons, D-DE) to the Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) would have stripped out the provisions to give legal standing to states to sue the federal government for 1) violating "detention and removal requirements"; 2) releasing aliens that go on to harm the state or its residents; and 3) violating the requirement to discontinue visas to countries who refuse to take their citizens back. (The amendment failed 46-49.)
2025 (Jan. 09): Sen. Markey voted against of the first cloture on the Laken Riley Act (S. 5) to proceed to debate and amendments.
The Laken Riley Act (by Katie Britt, R-AL) included a provision to require the detention of aliens who have been convicted or arrested for various forms of theft (burglary, larceny & shoplifting); also included provisions to give legal standing to states to sue the federal government for 1) violating "detention and removal requirements"; 2) releasing aliens that go on to harm the state or its residents; and 3) violating the requirement to discontinue visas to countries who refuse to take their citizens back. (The cloture vote passed 84-9, allowing the Senate to proceed with amending the legislation.)
118th Congress (2023-2024) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F- (0%)
2023: Sponsored S. 1208 to weaken interior enforcement.
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1208, the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act of 2023, introduced by Sen. Cory Booker (R-N.J.). The legislation would require annual in-person inspections of detention facilities, require public disclosure of detention facilities, allow for civil claims for those injured while in detention, require taxpayer-funded transportation for aliens through their court proceedings, limits bond to not impose financial hardship on the alien, and a presumption for release. Additionally, the bill will phase out private detention facilities, require an immigration warrant for all detentions, and ban detention of aliens under 21, over 60, pregnant, LGBTQ, victims or witnesses of crimes, filed a nonfrivolous civil rights or workplace claim, has a serious mental or physical illness, or disability, has been determined to have credible fear, has limited English and isn't given access to language services quickly, or has experienced "gender-based violence."
2023: Sponsored S. 1187 to expand legal access for illegal aliens
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1187, the Fairness to Freedom Act, introduced by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.). The legislation would establish a right to counsel in immigration proceedings. Further, it would create an Office of Immigration Representation and authorizes an amount to be appropriated equal to what is spent on enforcement.
2023: Sponsored S. 1343 to discourage sanctuary cities
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1343, the Fair Adjudications for Immigrants Act, introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). The legislation would redefine convictions for illegal aliens to only include a final order of guilt from a judge.
2023: Sponsored S. 1392 to strictly limit interior enforcement
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1392, the Citizenship for Essential Workers Act, introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). The legislation would prevent removal of most illegal aliens by creating broad exemptions that would cover most aliens illegaly present in the United States.
2023: Voted against S. Amdt. 110 to H.R. 3476 to mandate E-Verify and criminalize visa overstays
Sen. Markey voted against S. Amdt. 110, offered by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) to H.R. 3476. S. Amdt. 110 would have added the House-passed H.R. 2 to the Debt Limit compromise bill. The legislation would require most employers to use E-Verify within two years to ensure that new hires are authorized to work in the United States. The legislation provides additional time for agricultural employers to comply. The bill would also make overstaying a visa a felony crime and allow Unaccompanied Alien Children from noncontiguous countries to be returned to their home countries.
117th Congress (2021-2022) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F- (0%)
2022: Sponsored S. 2954 to redefine the term conviction in immigration courts Sen. Markey sponsored S. 2954, the Fair Adjudications for Immigrants Act, introduced by Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). The legislation would redefine a conviction in immigration courts to only include guilty convictions by immigration judges.
2022: Sponsored S. 4529 to limit family separation Sen. Markey sponsored S. 4529, the Childrens Safe Welcome Act, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.). The legislation would strictly limit family separation for aliens while in either DHS or HHS custody. The legislation would also ban family detention centers and reinforce the Flores Settlement Agreement that limits the amount of time that DHS can detain children.
2021: Sponsored S. 1186, the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, to significantly weaken interior enforcement Sen. Markey sponsored S. 1186, the Dignity for Detained Immigrants Act, introduced by Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.). The legislation would make it extremely difficult for DHS to detain illegal aliens and provide those that are detained with a number of benefits. The legislation would also ban contracts with private detention facilities, repeal mandatory detention provisions, limit bond amounts, and ban the use of ankle monitors, among other things.
116th Congress (2019-2020) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F- (0%)
2020: Voted in favor of H.R 133, the Consolidated Appropriations Act on Senate floor Sen. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 133, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, that would weaken interior enforcement and increase foreign worker visas. The bill reduced funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement by $431 million. Further, the bill authorized the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor to increase the number of H-2B visas issued during the 2021 fiscal year.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1591, the End Mass Deportation Act, to weaken interior enforcement Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1591, the End Mass Deportation Act, introduced by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV). The bill would nullify Pres. Trumps interior enforcement executive order issued in Jan. 2017 that established priorities for enforcement, encouraged support for 287(g) agreements, and called for penalties for sanctuary jurisdictions.
2019: Cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2113, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR). The bill would severely limit the separation of families, lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement limiting the amount of time minors can be detained, remove the federal prohibition on taxpayer-funded council for illegal aliens, and increases the number of immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1733, the Protecting Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, to encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1733, the Protecting Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA). The bill would: 1) prevent the separation of families within 100 miles of the border, 2) call for limited detention of family units, 3) lock in the Flores Settlement Agreement that requires the feds to release minors within 20 days, 4) appoint taxpayer-funded attorneys for UACs in removal proceedings, and add 75 immigration judges.
2019: Cosponsored S. 2219 to weaken interior enforcement Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2219, introduced by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA). The bill would establish the privilege of counsel and right of counsel in removal proceedings, which would slow down the removal process.
2019: Cosponsored S. 2097 that would weaken interior enforcement Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 2097, the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, introduced by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.), that would prohibit ICE from detaining illegal aliens in certain locations.
2019: Cosponsored S. 1894, the Alternatives to Detention Act of 2019, to weaken enforcement and encourage border surges Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 1894, the Alternatives to Detention Act of 2019, introduced by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV). The bill would expand Alternatives to Detention (ATD) to aliens who are members of a vulnerable population and defines vulnerable population as nearly every one.
2019: Voted in favor of H.R. 1158, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, to weaken interior enforcement Sen. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 1158, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, that provides funding for the federal government for FY2020. H.R. 1158 effectively prohibits ICE from cooperating with Health and Human Services to detain or remove illegal alien sponsors of unaccompanied alien children (UACs).
2019: Cosponsored S. 879, the Safe Environment from Countries Under Repression and Emergency Act, introduced by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 879, the Safe Environment from Countries Under Repression and Emergency Act. This legislation would give Legal Permanent Residency to all foreign citizens (mostly illegal aliens) who have received Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure, including those removed or deported pursuant to a voluntary departure order. Approximately 440,000 foreign citizens would receive LPR status under this bill.
2019: Cosponsored S. 557, the REUNITE Act, introduces by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Cali.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 557, the REUNITE Act of 2019. This legislation would require the reunification of separated families, allow for attorneys to help alien minors bring suit against the government, allow for the waiving of DNA tests to confirm familial connections. The legislation would encourage more family units to cross the U.S. border illegally.
2019: Cosponsored S. 661, the Child Trafficking Victims Protection and Welfare Act of 2019, introduced by Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii). Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 661, the Child Trafficking Victims Protection and Welfare Act of 2019. This legislation would mandate that Customs and Border Patrol have child welfare training, the creation of new protections for children including procedures to ensure they get back to separated parents, and require an assessment as to the best interests of the child and family members regarding deportation. The legislation would encourage unaccompanied alien children and family units to cross the border illegally.
2019: Cosponsored S. 388, the Families, Not Facilities Act, introduced by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 388, the Families, Not Facilities Act of 2019. This legislation would prohibit the use of information provided by UACs to apprehend, detain, or remove UACs, custodians, residents of the home, or sponsors. It would not allow funds to be used for enforcement, detention, and removal operations in violation of the Wilberforce Act. In doing so, the legislation would encourage additional UACs and family units to cross the border illegally.
2019: Cosponsored S. 197, the Protect DREAMer Confidentiality Act, introduced by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 197, the Protect DREAMer Confidentiality Act of 2019. This legislation would prohibit DHS or ICE from using DACA documentation to arrest or detain illegal aliens.
115th Congress (2017-2018) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F- (0%)
2018: Voted in favor of the Schumer-Collins-Rounds-King amendment that would weaken interior enforcement Sen. Markey voted for the amendment offered by Sens. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), and Angus King (I-Maine) to the Senate shell bill for granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The Schumer-Collins-Rounds-King amendment would have reprioritized interior enforcement, protecting nearly every illegal alien, including illegal aliens not even in the country yet, for deportation. The amendment failed 54-to-45 (needed 60 votes to pass).
2018: Voted against Sen. Toomeys amendment that would punish sanctuary cities Sen. Markey voted against an amendment offered by Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) to the Senate shell bill for granting amnesty to illegal aliens. The Toomey amendment would: 1) block certain Federal grants to sanctuary jurisdictions and reallocate those funds to jurisdictions that uphold Federal law, 2) protect local police from lawsuits for honoring ICE detainer requests, and 3) explicitly allow localities to protect from referral to ICE victims of or witnesses to a crime. The amendment failed 54-to-45 (needed 60 votes to pass).
2017: Cosponsored legislation to provide free legal counsel to all illegal aliens in 2017 (Harris) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 349, legislation that would provide taxpayer-funded legal counsel to all illegal aliens.
2017: Cosponsored legislation ending the 287(g) program (Booker) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 303. This legislation would end the 287(g) program by prohibiting the federal government from entering into agreements with states and local jurisdictions to assist with immigration enforcement efforts. The bills main sponsor is Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ).
2017: Cosponsored legislation weakening interior enforcement (Blumenthal) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 845, the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act. This legislation would prevent federal immigration agents from detaining illegal aliens in certain public places. The bills main sponsor is Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT).
2017: Cosponsored S. 415, introduced by Sen. Cortez-Masto (D-Nev.), to void President Trumps sanctuary city executive order Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 415, legislation that would void President Trumps executive order that prevented sanctuary cities from receiving certain federal funds.
2017: Cosponsored legislation nullifying Pres. Trumps border security EO (Carper) Sen. Markey cosponsored S. 725. This legislation would nullify Pres. Trumps Jan. 25, 2017 executive order that improves border security and strengthens interior enforcement. The bills main sponsor is Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE).
114th Congress (2015-2016) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F (6%)
2016: Voted against beginning debate on legislation to end sanctuary cities (Toomey) Sen. Markey has voted against invoking cloture on S. 3100, the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act. The bill would help end sanctuary policies that aim to protect criminal aliens by defining sanctuary jurisdictions as any state or local jurisdiction that fails to communicate with federal immigration agents and refuses to comply with detainer requests. The bill would also block certain federal funds from sanctuary cities and shield local police from liability when acting on behalf of a federal immigration request.
2015: Voted to protect Sanctuary Cities in 2015 (Vitter) Sen. Markey voted against cloture to open debate on S. 2146, the Stop Sanctuary Policies and Protect Americans Act. This legislation would withhold certain federal funding from jurisdictions that enact sanctuary policies, require the Department of Homeland Security to create a public list of jurisdictions that have sanctuary policies in effect, protect local law enforcement from liability in holding criminal aliens for ICE pick-up, and increase penalties for illegal re-entry into the United States. The bill is sponsored by Sen. David Vitter (R-La.).
113th Congress (2013-2014) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
no action
112th Congress (2011-2012) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F (14%)
2012: Voted against an amendment to protect the 287(g) program (Sullivan) Rep. Markey voted against the Sullivan amendment to the FY2013 DHS Appropriations Bill. The amendment would prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from terminating 287(g) agreements. The amendment, offered by Rep. John Sullivan (R-Ok.), passed by a 250-164 vote (7 June 2012).
2011: Supported an amendment to keep violent illegal aliens in custody (Cravaack) Rep. Markey supported the Cravaack Amendment to the FY 2012 DHS Appropriations Bill. Rep. Cravaacks amendment would prevent the government from releasing convicted violent or dangerous illegal aliens while they are awaiting deportation. The amendment passed 289-131 (2 June 2011).
2011: Supported an amendment to restrict local enforcement (Polis) Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Polis Amendment to H.R. 2017, the FY2012 DHS Appropriations Bill. Rep. Polis amendment would have removed all funding for the 287(g) program from the bill, thereby preventing DHS from administering the program (effectively killing the 287(g) program). The amendment failed by a vote of 313-107 (2 June 2011).
2011: Voted against an amendment to increase 287(g) funding (Royce) Rep. Markey voted against the Royce Amendment to H.R. 2017, the FY2012 DHS Appropriations Bill. This amendment would increase funding for the 287(g) program by $1 million (about 18.5%). The amendment passed by a vote of 268-151 (1 June 2011).
111th Congress (2009-2010) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F (6%)
2009-2010: Voted against an amendment to require DHS contractors to use E-Verify.
Rep. Markey voted against the King amendment (253) to H.R. 2892, the DHS appropriations bill. The amendment requires all DHS contractors and subcontractors to use the E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of their employees. The King Amendment would have essentially implemented an Executive Order signed by President George W. Bush requiring all federal contractors to use E-Verify that has continually been postponed by President Obama. Use of E-Verify is one of the most effective tools at keeping illegal aliens out of U.S. jobs. The amendment passed 349-84, and the bill was signed into law October 28th, 2009. Rep. Markeys vote was one to continue allowing illegal aliens in the U.S. workforce.
110th Congress (2007-2008) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
D+ (34%)
2008: Voted for a bill that continues employment verification.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of H.R. 6633, a bill to reauthorize the E-Verify program for a period of 5 years. The E-Verify program allows businesses to determine the legal status of new hires and prevents illegal aliens from being hired, thus making the program an important tool in the Attrition through Enforcement anti-illegal immigration strategy. The bill passed by a vote of 407-2.
2008: Voted against punishing sanctuary cities.
Rep. Markey voted against a motion to H.R. 5719, the Taxpayer Assistance and Simplification Act. This motion would have recommitted H.R. 5719 with instructions to add language to deny tax exempt interest with respect to bonds of sanctuary states and cities, thereby putting pressure on cities that do not enforce immigration laws and cities who do not cooperate with federal authorities on immigration matters. This motion failed by a vote of 210-210.
2008: Has Not Signed Discharge Petition to move H.R. 4088, a bill to increase interior enforcement Rep. Markey has not signed the Discharge Petition on H.R. 4088, the SAVE Act, to require use of the electronic employment eligibility verification system, E-Verify. If the petition collects 218 signatures, a simple majority, the bill can bypass the committee process and be placed on the House floor for a vote.
2007-2008: Voted on House floor for against an amendment to fully fund the training of immigration enforcement officers.
Rep. Markey voted against the Drake Amendment to H.R. 2638, the appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security. The Drake Amendment would fully fund the presidents budget request ($26.4 million) for the training and support for the voluntary participation of local law enforcement officers in immigration law enforcement. This amendment passed 286-127.
2007: Voted in favor of sanctuary cities for illegal aliens Rep. Markey voted against an amendment (H. Amdt. 294) to H.R. 2638 offered by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO). The Tancredo amendment would prohibit funds from the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill from being distributed to states and localities that have sanctuary policies in place that prohibit or inhibit communications between Federal and state/local authorities. The Tancredo Amendment passed by a vote of 234 to 189.
2007-2008: Voted against an amendment to reduce funding for the visa waiver program.
Rep. Markey voted against the first Tancredo amendment to H.R. 2638, which would prohibit funding from H.R. 2638 from being used to fund the visa waiver program. This amendment failed 76-347.
109th Congress (2005-2006) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
D- (16%)
2006: Voted against a bill that increases interior enforcement by allowing the federal government to remove aliens from El Salvador.
Rep. Markey voted against H.R. 6095 to clarify state and local law enforcements inherent authority to enforce Federal immigration laws and overturn a decades-old court injunction that impedes the Federal governments ability to remove aliens from El Salvador on an expedited basis. H.R. 6095 passed by a vote of 277-140.
2006: Voted against an amendment that disallows sanctuary cities for illegal aliens.
Rep. Markey voted against the King Amendment to H.R. 5441, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill of 2007. The King amendment would deny federal homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to share information with Federal immigration authorities.
2006: Voted for an amendment that increased interior enforcement by funding workplace verification.
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Marshall Amendment to H.R. 5441, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill of 2007. The Marshall Amendment would fund USCISs electronic employment eligibility verification program. It passed by a vote of 358-63.
2005-2006: Voted against an amendment that requires complete execution of the previously instituted entry-exit system.
Rep. Markey voted against the Sullivan Amendment to H.R. 4437 to require full implementation of the automated entry-exit system that was instituted by Congress in 1996. The Sullivan Amendment failed by a vote of 163 to 251.
2005-2006: Voted against a bill to require their employees legal right to work in the U.S.
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 4437 which would increase interior enforcement by requiring employers to use the Basic Pilot program to verify that new hires have the legal right to work in the United States. As well, it would bring state and local law enforcement agencies more into the enforcement fold and provide funding through both grants and reimbursement for their assistance in federal enforcement efforts. H.R. 4437 was passed by the House by a vote of 239 to 182.
2005-2006: Voted against an amendment to confirm local law enforcement has the authority to enforce current immigration law.
Rep. Markey voted against the Norwood Amendment to H.R. 4437 to reaffirm state and local law enforcements existing inherent authority to assist in the enforcement of immigration law. It would bring state and local law enforcement agencies more into the enforcement fold and provide funding through both grants and reimbursement for their assistance in federal enforcement efforts. The Norwood Amendment passed by a vote of 237 to 180.
2005-2006: Voted against H. Amdt. 288 (Tancredo) and in favor of sanctuary policies for illegal aliens
Rep. Markey voted against H. Amdt. 288 to H.R. 2862, the CJS Appropriations bill. The amendment would deny certain federal funding to states and cities that violate federal law by enacting sanctuary policies to protect illegal aliens. The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), failed by a vote of 204 to 222 on June 16, 2005 (2:54 PM).
2005-2006: Voted against amendment (Norwood) to H.R. 1817 to clarify State authority concerning immigration law
Rep. Markey voted against the Norwood Amendment to the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill to clarify the existing authority of State and local law enforcement to enforce immigration laws and detain illegal aliens on May 18, 2005 (6:31 PM). Rep. Charles Norwood (R-Ga.) was the primary sponsor.
2005-2006: Voted against H. Amdt. 138 (Tancredo) and in favor of sanctuary policies for illegal aliens
Rep. Markey voted against H. Amdt. 138 to H.R. 2360, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2006. The amendment would deny federal homeland security funding to states and local governments who refuse to share information with Federal immigration authorities. The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), failed by a vote of 165 to 258 on May 17, 2005 (5:23 PM).
None
108th Congress (2003-2004) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
F- (0%)
2004: Voted against bill to expand expedited removal provisions (Hastert)
Rep. Markey voted against final passage of H.R. 10 that included provisions to increase interior enforcement by expanding current expedited removal provisions. H.R. 10 required DHS to utilize expedited removal in the case of all aliens who have entered the U.S. illegally and have not been present here for five years. As well H.R. 10 contained provisions that would enhance entry-exit screening measures for people entering and exiting the U.S. H.R. 10, sponsored by Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), passed by a vote of 282-134.
2004: Voted in favor of a Motion to Recommit (Maloney) on H.R. 10 to strip provisions for expedited removal
Rep. Markey voted in favor of a Maloney Motion to Recommit with Instructions to strip from H.R. 10 provisions to increase interior enforcement by expanding current expedited removal provisions. H.R. 10 required DHS to utilize expedited removal in the case of all aliens who have entered the U.S. illegally and have not been present here for five years. As well H.R. 10 contained provisions that would enhance entry-exit screening measures for people entering and exiting the U.S. The Maloney Motion to Recommit, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), failed by a vote of 193-223.
2004: Voted for amendment (Smith) to decrease interior enforcement by stripping expedited removal provisions
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Smith Amendment to H.R. 10 to strip the expanded expedited removal provision from H.R. 10. This is the provision that had the potential to dramatically increase deportations of illegal aliens by eliminating the appeals process. Somewhere around 2.5 million illegal aliens could be subject to the expedited removal provision. The Smith Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Christopher Smith (R-N.J.), failed by a vote of 203-210.
2004: Voted against amendment (Green) to H.R. 10 to create grounds of deportability
Rep. Markey voted against the Green Amendment to H.R. 10 to make all terrorist-related grounds of inadmissibility, grounds of deportability, as well. The Green Amendment sought to strengthen immigration law with regard to the deportability of alien terrorists. The Green Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Mark Green (R-Wis.), passed by a vote of 283-132.
2004: Voted in favor of amendment (Menendez) to H.R. 10 to strip expedited removal provisions
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Menendez Amendment to strip from H.R. 10 provisions to increase interior enforcement by expanding current expedited removal provisions. H.R. 10 required DHS to utilize expedited removal in the case of all aliens who have entered the U.S. illegally and have not been present here for five years. As well H.R. 10 contained provisions that would enhance entry-exit screening measures for people entering and exiting the U.S. The Menendez Amendment, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), failed by a vote of 203-213.
2004: Voted against the King Amendment to H.R. 4754 (Wolf) to enforce federal laws against sanctuary policies for illegal aliens
Rep. Markey voted against increasing funding to the Justice Department for enforcing current federal law against sanctuary policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and potentially, terrorists. The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), failed by a vote of 139-278.
2004: Voted against the Tancredo Amendment to H.R. 4567 (Rogers) that would enforce Federal law against sanctuary policies.
Rep. Markey voted against prohibiting homeland security funding from going to states or cities that violate Federal law with sanctuary policies that protect illegal aliens, criminal aliens, and potentially, terrorists. Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) was the primary sponsor of this amendment.
2003-2004: Voted against bill to increase interior enforcement through workplace verification (Calvert).
Rep. Markey voted against the Basic Pilot Extension Act of 2003 to extend for five years the voluntary workplace verification pilot program. This program is an important component of preventing illegal aliens from taking jobs from legal workers. H.R. 2359, sponsored by Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), failed by a vote of 231-170, but eventually passed as S. 1685 and was signed by President George W. Bush.
107th Congress (2001-2002) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
no action
106th Congress (1999-2000) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
no action
105th Congress (1997-1998) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
no action
104th Congress (1995-1996) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
C+ (62%)
1996: Voted against a bill to increase interior enforcement, such as restricting sanctuary cities.
Rep. Markey voted against H.R. 2202, a large omnibus bill with dozens of provisions aimed at reducing illegal immigration. Among the interior enforcement measures included in the bill were restrictions against sanctuary cities for illegal aliens. H.R. 2202, sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), passed by a vote of 333-87.
1996: Voted against an amendment that would have ended a workplace verification program.
Rep. Markey voted against the Chabot Amendment to H.R. 2202 to kill the voluntary pilot workplace verification program in 5 states. Workplace verification is an essential tool for withdrawing the job magnet from illegal aliens. The Chabot Amendment, sponsored by Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio), failed by a vote of 260-159.
1996: Voted in favor of the Gallegly Amendment to increase interior enforcement through mandatory workplace verification pilot program
Rep. Markey voted in favor of the Gallegly Amendment to H.R. 2202 (Smith) to make the pilot workplace verification program mandatory in five states. This would have helped reduce illegal immigration by reducing the job magnet for illegal aliens. The amendment, sponsored by Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-Calif.), failed by a vote of 86-331.
103rd Congress (1993-1994) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
no action
101st Congress (1989-1990) Strengthen Interior Enforcement
no action
0%
F-
Leadership/Other Actions
119th Congress (2025-2026) Leadership/Other Actions
no action
118th Congress (2023-2024) Leadership/Other Actions
no action
2023: Sponsored S. 883 to reduce barriers for illegal aliens
Sen. Markey sponsored S. 883, the New Deal for New Americans Act, introduced by Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). The legislation would provide grants for legal services for illegal aliens, reduce fees for naturalization, and waive English language requirements, among other things.